Bill O'Reilly and Marc Lamont Hill Debate NYC School Brawl
Bill O'Reilly debates Black intellectual Marc Lamont Hill about the causes and cures for the rising violence in public education.
Canal: News & Politics
Añadido: December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm
Autor: way180
Duración: 05:27
Puntuación: 3.89
Reproducciones: 9175
Etiquetas: Black Brawl Education Fox Hill Intellectual Lamont Marc MSG O'Reilly Public Racist
Recomienda este vídeo
Agregar a Favoritos!
Comentarios de http://www.cantaecuador.com
Comentarios de YouTube
|
reggiemiller (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
marc lamont hill > your favorite news caster
agnosticautonomy (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
these two need to get a show together....
pomlyh (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
you are being an idiot, this is why he responded in such a way. your point relies purely on generalisation and loose association. 'rap marginalised women' - idiotic and ignorant. it's like saying country music promotes racism or blues promotes gun crime, a sweeping generalisation developed from a factor.
ILoveGoodFellas (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
parents punching students, LMFAO
manixxxo (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
¿Is the Bible deplorable? Whammmm!¿What do you think about the behaviour these youngsters exhibit then? Better or worse than the Bible?IMAO
4ourthofjuly (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
That does it, Bill is definitely a bigot. He is misrepresenting "judeo christianity" and islam. Theyre both more complex than that, and the hebrew bible is as deplorable as the koran. He cant see that, because he's a bigot.
northxphillysxfinest (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
i quess fatiguedout is hatinq on my uncle. even in person he talks fast ; wtf are you talkinq about ? he does have back bone. soo stfu. :) & dboyatcha fxck you. you dont have to be impressed no one asked you. :) ANY OTHER HATERS ? FXCK YOU ALL. :) lmao. uncle marc keep doinq your thinq. im your biqqest fan. ! :) <3
dboyatcha (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
The more I watch Lemont debate the more I get the impression that he's a moral relativist who argues from a very "general" platform. The more I hear him the less I respect his opinion on the defensive. Not impressed
trakkaton (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
It's only accurate if he wants to be interviewed by Amy Goodman in the future. If he wants to appear on Fucks News, bringing some sanity to the no-fact-zone, he has to play by the rules (even though some can even do without, like Colbert and Stewart, but they are FAMOUS).
FATIGUEDOUT (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
and that's my point. M. Lamont has to alter hiself just to be heard. If he cannot just be hiself then he is comelled to cator to the status quo and assume a servile role in order to be appreciated by "the man".
|
