The Convenient Solution
Find out more at http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/s... short film about climate change, energy and nuclear power. If you're confused about whether we need nuclear power to stop climate change, take nine minutes of your time to watch our new film. It doesn't just explain why nuclear power can't stop climate change - it also points the way to a better, cheaper, more convenient solution.
Canal: News & Politics
Añadido: December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm
Autor: GreenpeaceUK
Duración: 09:27
Puntuación: 4.05
Reproducciones: 58862
Etiquetas: CHP climatechange efficiency globalwarming greenpeace nuclear nuclearpower renewables solution
Recomienda este vídeo
Agregar a Favoritos!
Comentarios de http://www.cantaecuador.com
Comentarios de YouTube
|
ApacheLQ (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
I tried to find this out on the Greenpeace website with no luck... Is there a transcript of this video anywhere online? I'd like to use it as a reference in an essay I'm writing. Could you message me with some details about it, i.e. when it was made, who published it, who the copyright belongs to etc. so I can cite from it? (I need this fairly fast, the essay is due in next week :s)
GreenpeaceUK (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Good point - thanks!
bagheraa (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
(producing 48GWh heating/cooling and 22GWh electricity)You need to add per year (Gwh/year) otherwise it doesnt make sense ;)
GreenpeaceUK (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
As of mid-2007 Southampton has four CHP networks: 1. City Centre Geothermal (producing 48GWh heating/cooling and 22GWh electricity) 2. A Combined Heat and Power engine at City Centre hospital 3. Holyrood Community Heating Scheme (heating 300 flats) 4. Uni of Southampton CHP (producing 1.5mw heat and 1.5mw electricity)and two large schemes being developed: 1. Millbrook District Energy Scheme 4000 homes heated 2. Woolston Riverside Scheme heating for 15 hectare site.
bagheraa (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
somesay that the southampton geothermal chp has been shutdown for years...
ejbh3160 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
My local council wants to build a 50,000 ton a year rubbish incinerator in the middle of town & they're telling us it's "CHP"!What's more, incineration counts towards 'recycling figures' if the waste heat is used! So they're going to give cheap energy to Tescos! I couldn't believe it when I heard that one! That's my council's idea of 'recycling' & CHP all in one! Its enought to make one sick! Especially when the dioxins start filling the air from all that plastic being 'recycled'!
ejbh3160 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
hrthrhs.. ummm NO actually I don't!What a pathetic 'reason' to attack the video! Its like you were simply watching to pick holes in their graphics.. but without bothering to even listen to what they were ACTUALLY saying!! How about "that's enough to fill 500 Big Bens"?? maybe that's why they used more than 3!Crikey some people! What IS your problem with new ideas?In Australia you could basically power the entire country from solar, but hey the wind blows too... etc etc etc etc!
hrthrhs (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
But if you watch from 1:43 they certainly use more than just 3 Big Bens and more than 3 bags of money to emphasis their point when attacking nuclear power. You see what I'm saying?
ejbh3160 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
in what way wasn't it?
ejbh3160 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
All Volcanos.. 15 Million tons of CO2 PAMankind....... 26 BILLION tons of CO2 PADid you even watch it?What is needed EVERYWHERE is a MIX of solar, wind, wave & tidal power! It ain't about ONE renewable option its about ALL of them!Windmills can be put out at sea where huge arrays or rigs are possible combined with wave & even tidal power! If we can build oil rigs we can build massive wind/wave rigs too!Coal CO2 damages more & nukes will leave a toxic wasteland & WEAPONS grade plutonium!!
|
