B. F. Skinner - Modelagem


 
   

B.F. Skinner's Shaping Experiment (Skinner's Box) An adherent to Watson's theory of behaviorism, B.F. Skinner was able to demonstrate how one can modify behavior through a process he called "shaping." In contrast to pure classical conditioning, Skinner utilized positive and negative reinforcement to cause behavior.Utilizing a contraption that became known as "Skinner's Box" he demonstrated how he could shape the behavior of pigeons by reinforcing their behavior.Fonte: http://www.youtube.com/profile...

Canal: Education
Añadido: December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm
Autor: pauloslomp

Duración: 04:45
Puntuación: 5.00
Reproducciones: 66646

Etiquetas: behaviorism  behaviorismo  comportamentismo  conductismo  skinner  

Recomienda este vídeo

Agregar a Favoritos!



Video URL:


Insertar:

Comentarios de http://www.cantaecuador.com

Comentarios de YouTube

BenjaminAConner (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
By discovering the causes of behavior we can dispose of the imagined internal cause. - B.F. Skinner.Now don't tell me that Skinner acknowledged internal processes. I've heard him call them imaginary with my own ears.
HisLordshipTheOwl (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Skinner's views on operant conditioning remain extremely influential in understanding animal behaviours, from hamster to human. However, he's not the be-all and end-all of human psychology.Also - reductio ad Hilerum = autoloss.
yoyorayoo (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Steven Hawking probably embraces this shitbag's ideas. Skinner had no soul. You are just a dog to him and people who subscribe to his operant conditioning fucking bullshit. Nazi's probably love this man too.
flybybutterflies (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
my guinea pigs can do that too! watch?v=BAMgBp4i-Ik
flybybutterflies (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
I trained my guinea pigs to do that too! watch?v=BAMgBp4i-Ik
winterstellar (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Why is the rating disabled? This is an obvious 5-star video! :)
senseimak (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
I think what you guys are missing is the value of individuals buying into one school of thought so avidly. Each individual that believes 100% in something devotes all of their time to advancing that field. If we have an individual obsessively advancing each field we end up with multiple schools of thoughts/research being advanced at very high rates and those who are in the middle can benefit greatly from the use of each of these schools of thought.
wiscsuzski (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
I thought his flaw was in assuming people were pigeons.
Makavelian67 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
you sure won't love them after they crap on your porch/balcony dozens of times a day!
megan4197 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Pinker is a Sociobiologist. Sociobiology is inherently ad-hoc and therefore unscientific, in my opinion. If you want a valid biological theory, turn to Ethology.