747 vs. truck


 
   

Demonstration as to why you don't want to play by a 747.

Canal: Autos & Vehicles
Añadido: December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm
Autor: justmered

Duración: 01:40
Puntuación: 4.59
Reproducciones: 843769

Etiquetas: airplane  crash  demonstration  truck  united  

Recomienda este vídeo

Agregar a Favoritos!



Video URL:


Insertar:

Comentarios de http://www.cantaecuador.com

Comentarios de YouTube

Staslasd (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Π”Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΌ для лСгкости Π΄Π°ΠΆΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ Π²Ρ‹Ρ‚Π°Ρ‰ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ.
missvisadkline (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
so this is how I get my next car....I take a trip to the airport (lol)
rgra66 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
If there going to do it STICK AN ENGINE AND TRANSMISSION IN THE TRUCK!!!!!
Joonathan92 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
ouch
Weldaz1 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Waste of a perfectly good piece-a-shit truck...LMAO!!!! 767...747...I wouldn't be behind no jet...period!!!! Too bad, I coulda used it in our junk yard foryanking out parts & towing...a "junkyarddog."
airplanebuilderman (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
piloanthony your right is's a 767. And for everyone else's info if it was a 747 one could see the #4 engine @ 57 sec instead of #2 engine
peenoysf (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
oh and united did get a fine for the truck flying into the bay
peenoysf (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
man people here are dumb....its training video from united, no engine or trans because in the case of it blowing into San Francisco Bay, contamination would be minimal ( like the bay isnt already contaminated). Either engine or not your ass is still gonna get blown away
ManOfMeans (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Guess that's one way to write it off to taxes lmaooo
tooslow01 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
I know, but the truck should have its engine and tranny in it to make it more realistic.