747 vs. truck
Demonstration as to why you don't want to play by a 747.
Canal: Autos & Vehicles
Añadido: December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm
Autor: justmered
Duración: 01:40
Puntuación: 4.59
Reproducciones: 843769
Etiquetas: airplane crash demonstration truck united
Recomienda este vídeo
Agregar a Favoritos!
Comentarios de http://www.cantaecuador.com
Comentarios de YouTube
|
Staslasd (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
ΠΠ° ΡΠ°ΠΌ Π΄Π»Ρ Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π΄Π°ΠΆΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΡΠΎΡ Π²ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈ.
missvisadkline (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
so this is how I get my next car....I take a trip to the airport (lol)
rgra66 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
If there going to do it STICK AN ENGINE AND TRANSMISSION IN THE TRUCK!!!!!
Joonathan92 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
ouch
Weldaz1 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Waste of a perfectly good piece-a-shit truck...LMAO!!!! 767...747...I wouldn't be behind no jet...period!!!! Too bad, I coulda used it in our junk yard foryanking out parts & towing...a "junkyarddog."
airplanebuilderman (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
piloanthony your right is's a 767. And for everyone else's info if it was a 747 one could see the #4 engine @ 57 sec instead of #2 engine
peenoysf (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
oh and united did get a fine for the truck flying into the bay
peenoysf (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
man people here are dumb....its training video from united, no engine or trans because in the case of it blowing into San Francisco Bay, contamination would be minimal ( like the bay isnt already contaminated). Either engine or not your ass is still gonna get blown away
ManOfMeans (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Guess that's one way to write it off to taxes lmaooo
tooslow01 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
I know, but the truck should have its engine and tranny in it to make it more realistic.
|
