Canal:
Añadido: December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm
Autor:
Duración: 00:00
Puntuación: N/A
Reproducciones: N/A
Etiquetas:
Recomienda este vídeo
Agregar a Favoritos!
Comentarios de http://www.cantaecuador.com
Comentarios de YouTube
|
halburd1 (August 18, 2008 at 9:25 pm)
i feel sorry for bill try the science lie he says to buddy at the end you wernt there you didnt see it. yet was bill lie there? atleast buddy was there & he did see it and larry corrects him and says he was there and seen it he even had the video to watch. Bill if you read this stick to your kiddy show & stay away from the adults. your too blind to know anything more than baking soda fizzs with vinegar. you can try this science trik applying vaseline to your asshole may help extract your head.
halburd1 (August 18, 2008 at 9:17 pm)
bill nye the bitch slapped guy. his argument against it was destoyed in buddies first comment with the triple power redudancy. what a troil you think nukes get affected by a local power outage lol. bill lie the fake science cry
paisleymike (August 18, 2008 at 7:19 pm)
"On science is not evidence", Bill Nye is an ass, fuckin sell out!
bettythehalf (August 15, 2008 at 11:21 pm)
their other life out their million of plant out their lik earth that can hvae life ...eveery human is fucking dumb i cant wait for the world to die
BCBUDDD (August 14, 2008 at 9:14 pm)
"are u going to do this with baking soda and vinegar bill" HAHAHAH
ImaginationBlue (August 14, 2008 at 2:52 am)
I have to admit, Jacobs' attacks on Bill Nye are pretty ugly and uncalled for. Nye is just providing an opposing viewpoint, something which shouldn't be a threat to anyone who thinks the evidence is solid. I've seen arrogant scientists and debunkers... i don't find Nye to be one of them. I thought he was pretty respectful and level headed. I think the guests' conclusions about who shuts down the missiles and why may well be true, but I wasn't crazy about their mistreatment of Nye.
BoyintheMachine (August 10, 2008 at 9:51 pm)
lord69z: Again the ignorance! Today the means of faking UFO videos is rampant. However, 20, 30, 40, 50, years ago that wasn't the case. There was a few standard ways in which they could be done, models, reflections of lights on glass, throwing an object in the air & snapping a picture, etc. Many pics have been proven fake. Many pics continue to stump even the best photo analysis of today.In the end it doesn't matter. No evidence is good enough for the 'scepti-bunkers'.
dahur1 (August 10, 2008 at 9:46 pm)
"Film is so easily fakable you'd need a clear and perfect image to convince anyone anymore."This is what makes it so difficult to use pictures or video today, to convince anyone. However back in 1964, with Dr Jacobs' incident, I don't think that was the case.I absolutely believe that what he said happened, is what did happen.
lord69z (August 10, 2008 at 8:27 pm)
I work in post-production studio with all the compositing software when we do commercials/films.Film is so easily fakable you'd need a clear and perfect image to convince anyone anymore.
neimer (August 10, 2008 at 9:12 am)
Actually, Dr. Jacobs is my Electronic Media Professor at Bradley University. He may be a little crazy, but he's knows his stuff, especially about film.
|
