Tomahawk Missile Variants
Various test firings and modes of the TLAM Tomahawk Land Attack Missile. I found this video looking for comparisons beteen the Pentagon impact on 9/11 and a missile impact, only to find the explotion on 9/11 was many times bigger then what a TLAM (Our best cruise missile) can do.
Canal: Howto & Style
Añadido: December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm
Autor: sorienor
Duración: 02:16
Puntuación: 4.40
Reproducciones: 409783
Etiquetas: 9/11 bush change conspiracy george iraq loose military missile movement pentagon test TLAM tomahawk truth war
Recomienda este vídeo
Agregar a Favoritos!
Comentarios de http://www.cantaecuador.com
Comentarios de YouTube
|
samppu74 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
What the hell is this shit music? Your own band?!?
laux33 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
too slow now, arms are instantly
mgsfan15 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
The Pentagon was burning for a LONG time. Missiles aren't meant to burn the target, there meant to destroy with the force of the explosion and impact.And sorienor, thanks for the video, this is just what I was looking for. It is clear that the Pentagon's damage isn't from a missile. unless it's a Land to Land missile the size of a limozine that hit it. Which is even more unlikely.
TeleCumber (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Actually if you google images "missile damage" you'll find photos of damage to concrete buildings that looks remarkably similar to the pentagon damage.If a large airliner hit at over 500mph however, the whole section would have been destroyed.
sorienor (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
You mean the hole that is the exact diameter of a 757 fuselage? Explosives would have created a HUGE and/or irregular hole or simply obliterated the building entirely.The rest is complete conjecture and bullshit.
TeleCumber (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Wasn't talking so much about the explosion.Rather the object we're told is a 757 nose, but is too small and low, and is shaped like a missile - and the white smoke trail it leaves. Also the silvery flash on impact is characteristic of a missile. Then there's the round hole it made. Anyway..
sorienor (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
No. None of these look anywhere close to the pentagon explosion. Look again, this time without bias.The fireball as the pentagon was huge, indicative of a fuel-air explosion. There is almost no fire at all in the detonations of this video.
TeleCumber (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Looks like what you see on the 9/11 pentagon security camera footage. Take a look.
export83 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
yay
CapitanFiro (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
spain are going to buy this missile =D
|
